Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria

References 

1. Chernesky M, Castriciano S, Jang D, Smieja M. Use of flocked swabs and a universal transport medium to enhance molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:1084–1086
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Quality Control of Microbiological Transport Systems. Approved Standard M40-A. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2003;
3. Daley P, Castriciano S, Chernesky M, Smieja M. Comparison of flocked and rayon swabs for collection of respiratory epithelial cells from uninfected volunteers and symptomatic patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:2265–2267
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Drake C, Barenfanger J, Lawhorn J, Verhulst S. Comparison of Easy-Flow Copan liquid Stuart's and Starplex swab transport systems for recovery of fastidious aerobic bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:1301–1303
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Österblad M, Järvinen H, Lönnqvist K, Huikko S, Laippala P, Viljanto J, et al. Evaluation of a new cellulose sponge-tipped swab for microbiological sampling: a laboratory and clinical investigation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:1894–1900
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Roelofsen E, van Leeuwen M, Meijer-Severs GJ, Wilkinson MHF, Degener JE. Evaluation of the effects of storage in two different swab fabrics and under three different transport conditions on recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37:3041–3043
   • MEDLINE
7. Van Horn KG, Audette CD, Sebeck D, Tucker KA. Comparison of the Copan ESwab system with two Amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:1655–1658
   • CrossRef