Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 129-134 (February 2010)

1 of 22 View next.

Reevaluation of the Premier Clostridium difficile toxin A and B immunoassay with comparison to glutamate dehydrogenase common antigen testing evaluating Bartels cytotoxin and Prodesse ProGastro Cd polymerase chain reaction as confirmatory procedures

Kirk M. DoingabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marilyn S. Hintza, Calvin Keefea, Sarah Horneb, Shelby LeVasseurb, Martha L. Kulikowskia

Received 17 July 2009; accepted 2 September 2009.

Abstract 

Enzyme immunoassays are currently the most common tests used in the clinical laboratory for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins; however, significant problems with their performance have recently been described. We prospectively reevaluated the Meridian Premier C. difficile toxin A/B assay with direct comparison to a 2-step algorithm that screened for C. difficile common antigen and compared cytotoxin and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as confirmatory procedures. The Premier assay lacked sufficient sensitivity, missing 25% of true-positive samples. PCR was the most sensitive method and the only procedure that allowed same day testing and reporting.

a Affiliated Laboratory, Inc., Bangor, ME 04401, USA

b Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-207-973-6900; fax: +1-207-973-6999.

 Work performed at Affiliated Laboratory.

PII: S0732-8893(09)00364-2

doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.09.001

1 of 22 View next.

Advertisement