Bacteriology
Detection of enteropathogens associated with travelers' diarrhea using a multiplex Luminex-based assay performed on stool samples smeared on Whatman FTA Elute cards

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.05.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We evaluated the detection limits for a polymerase chain reaction assay targeting travelers' diarrhea pathogens.

  • Whatman™ FTA Elute cards were smeared with spiked stool for testing.

  • The limit of detection ranged from 102 to 105 CFU, PFU, or cysts/g for most pathogens.

  • The limit of detection for Campylobacter and norovirus increased with prolonged storage.

  • Cryptosporidium was poorly detected from spiked stool and smeared stool cards.

Abstract

We evaluated the limits of detection (LoD) for an 11-plex PCR-Luminex assay performed on Whatman™ FTA Elute cards smeared with stool containing pathogens associated with travelers' diarrhea. LoDs ranged from 102 to 105 CFU, PFU, or cysts/g for most pathogens except Cryptosporidium. Campylobacter and norovirus LoDs increased with prolonged storage of cards.

Introduction

Travelers' diarrhea is frequently experienced by civilians and deployed military personnel traveling to developing countries. Although the identification of enteropathogens in epidemiologic studies has been greatly facilitated by the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (Al Amri et al., 2007, Aranda et al., 2004, Couturier et al., 2011), testing remains limited due to requirements for collection, storage, and transportation of diarrheal specimens. As a result, epidemiological data are largely derived from cohorts with on-site testing and storage facilities.

Self-collected stool smears obtained on a filter paper matrix is an appealing alternative for stool collection and storage in field conditions (Grimes et al., 2008, Orlandi and Lampel, 2000). However, the utility of filter paper and impact on PCR detection is unknown. We performed a pilot study to compare the limits of detection (LoDs) of a multiplex PCR assay between tool samples and smeared Whatman™ FTA Elute cards (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Pittsburgh, PA) and determine the impact of prolonged storage and environmental conditions on detection from cards. Enteropathogens tested included norovirus (GI and GII), Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), Shigella sonnei, Campylobacter jejuni, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Reference strains from commercial entities (American Type Culture Collection, Waterborne, and Zeptometrix) or clinical isolates (enteroaggregative E. coli and Campylobacter) were used. Bacterial strains were inoculated into Mueller–Hinton (MH) broth, incubated overnight, and the CFU/g concentration was determined by measuring the turbidity at 600 nm. Known concentrations of parasite oocysts and viruses were serially diluted in phosphate-buffered saline and deionized water, respectively. Five

Results

Overall, the LoDs ranged from 102 to 105 CFU, PFU, or cysts/g for most enteropathogens. LoDs were comparable (within 1–2 logs) between stool samples and stool cards at 1 week (Table 1). Cryptosporidium was not detected in spiked stool and had a high LoD in the stool card, probably due to the lack of oocyst disruption (e.g., bead beating) during sample processing. No sustained increase in the LoD at 3 months was noted for most pathogens except Campylobacter, which increased at 1 month and could not

Discussion

Our results indicate that the FTA Elute Card may be an effective method of storing genomic material from most diarrheal pathogens. Comparable LoDs were observed between stool samples and stool cards, indicating effective storage of genomic material and sequestration of factors inhibiting PCR. The LoDs observed were comparable to those reported in the literature (Liu et al., 2012, Navidad et al., 2013) and within the range associated with symptomatic infection (Granato et al., 2010, Lampel, 2005

Acknowledgments

The authors thank their collaborators at Naval Medical Research Center, Bethesda, MD, and Naval Medical Research Unit-6, Peru, for providing clinical isolates needed for assay validation.

Supported by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, a Department of Defense (DoD) program executed through the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), under the Inter-Agency Agreement

References (13)

  • J. Liu et al.

    Simultaneous detection of six diarrhea-causing bacterial pathogens with an in-house PCR-Luminex assay

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2012)
  • A. Al Amri et al.

    Multiplex PCR for direct identification of Campylobacter spp. in human and chicken stools

    J Med Microbiol

    (2007)
  • K.R. Aranda et al.

    Evaluation of multiplex PCRs for diagnosis of infection with diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella spp

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2004)
  • F. Barletta et al.

    Multiplex real-time PCR (MRT-PCR) for diarrheagenic

    Methods Mol Biol

    (2013)
  • M.R. Couturier et al.

    Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli detection in stool samples screened for viral gastroenteritis in Alberta, Canada

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2011)
  • H. Delacour et al.

    Noroviruses: a challenge for military forces

    J R Army Med Corps

    (2010)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • A new solid matrix for preservation of viral nucleic acid from clinical specimens at ambient temperature

    2019, Journal of Virological Methods
    Citation Excerpt :

    A 6.1% recovery rate was reported for enterovirus RNA from FTA classic cards (Li et al., 2012). Variable recovery for enteropathogens including E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Giardia, and norovirus GI and GII, was obtained with the FTA elute card (Lalani et al., 2015). More recently, norovirus was detected in 43% or fewer of samples on FTA elute cards as compared to frozen stools, although overall detection of all pathogens on the card was 73% (Lalani et al., 2018).

  • Detection of chikungunya viral RNA in mosquito bodies on cationic (Q) paper based on innovations in synthetic biology

    2017, Journal of Virological Methods
    Citation Excerpt :

    One commercial tool is the Whatman® FTA cards, which is used to collect samples for shipping and downstream analysis. These “Fast Technology for Analysis” paper cards exploit technology licensed from Flinders University (Salvador and De Ungria, 2003; Borman et al., 2010; Kiraz et al., 2015; Lalani et al., 2015). The product combines a weak base, a chelating agent, an anionic surfactant/detergent, and uric acid/urate salt in a cellulose matrix (such as filter paper) to preserve and store the NA (http://www.gelifesciences.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/catalog/en/GELifeSciences-us/products/AlternativeProductStructure_21465).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text